Advocacy

What We Want From the Farm Bill

By Michael Wall

Michael Wall is the Director of Farmer Advocacy at Georgia Organics.


Congress has finally given us drafts of the Farm Bill and there is plenty of cud of chew on, but definitely keep this in mind:

The passage of this important legislation is a marathon, not a sprint, and there still is a very long way to go. 

We don’t think it is time to pick up the phones and start calling Members of Congress - yet. But it is time to do some reading and to familiarize yourself with who your representatives are and how to get in touch with them for when the time comes. 


THE VERY LATEST ON THE FARM BILL

Actually, we’re not going to the play the “Very Latest on the Farm Bill” game. By the time we hit publish on this blog post, the Farm Bill and the politics around it will likely have changed a lot. Instead, we’re going to talk about what we want to see out of the Farm Bill and stay focused on the priorities our farmers told us about in the survey we sent out when we first launched Farmer Advocacy in 2022. 

We would add that there is a lot to be desired from both the Senate and House versions, at least as far we’ve seen (details on the Senate bill are forthcoming but there is an outline of sorts, and the text of the House version came out on Saturday, May 18). If we were forced to choose between the two, we’d go with the Senate version because it does include a meager increase in the Organic Cost Share Reimbursement Program, raising it from $750 annually to $1,000.  

We know our farmers need at least a $1,500 cost share each year for it to really stop Georgia from losing Certified Organic farms. It also includes parts of other pieces of legislation that we will get into further below. 

There are a few other pieces of the Senate bill that benefits Organic growers, the National Organic Program, and sustainable and organic ag research. But we are hoping and working for much more. 


OUR LATEST TRIP TO DC

Georgia Organics Farmer Services Director Lauren Cox and Farmer Advocacy Director Michael Wall visited the offices of several Members of Congress on May 16 with our partners at the Organic Trade Association (OTA). In the meetings, we reminded the folks that we already knew about our farmers’ priorities, and introduced new folks to Georgia Organics and what our farmers are hoping to get out of this next Farm Bill. 

On this trip we met with staff for: 

  • Rep. Drew Ferguson (R-03) 

  • Sen. Jon Ossoff (D) 

  • Sen. Reb. Raphael Warnock (D) 

  • Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-13) 

  • Rep. Austin Scott (R-8) 

In the meetings, House Republicans liked the House version of the Bill (the House is currently run by Republicans), and Senate Democrats think their version is the better one (the Senate is currently controlled by Democrats). 

Georgia Organics Farmer Services Director Lauren Cox and Farmer Advocacy Director Michael Wall in front of the Capitol building on a windy day in mid-May, 2024. 

WHAT WE WANT FROM THE NEXT FARM BILL

Soil health through the Agriculture Resilience Act

The issue our farmers said was most important to them was soil health, and no piece of legislation addresses soil health as thoroughly as the Agriculture Resilience Act (ARA).

The ARA:  

  • Attempts to get the US agricultural system to net zero on carbon emissions and has mechanisms to go even further 

  • Requires the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to establish a national network of regional hubs for risk adaptation and mitigation to climate change 

  • Creates a soil health grant program for state and tribal governments 

  • Focuses on perennial production systems and grass-based livestock systems for its climate-focused goals 

What ar our prospects? To be perfectly honest, this is a moonshot piece of legislation that would profoundly transform how food is produced and consumed in the United States. It is extremely doubtful that this entire bill will be folded into the Farm Bill, but it is possible that one or even two of its major provisions could be adopted. That wouldn’t be as transformative, but it would be significant progress. There are a few ARA ideas in the Senate version and nothing from the ARA is the House version.  

Support for Organics and Organic transition through the Opportunities in Organics Act

The Opportunities in Organics Act (OOA) would institutionalize most of the US Department of Agriculture’s recent bursts of support for Organic transition and Organic market development. If implemented into the Farm Bill, OOA would strengthen markets and market access for existing Organic growers, and help reduce the barriers and costs for growers to transition to Organic agriculture. This work is a core piece of Georgia Organics’ longtime programming, and one we support wholeheartedly.  

Prospects: Slim. We were hoping to see much more of the OOA’s components in the Senate version. There is very little if any pieces of OOA in the House version. 

What else are we advocating for?

The Whole Farm Revenue Protection Program Improvement Act (WFRPIA), which is co-sponsored by Georgia’s Sen. Warnock, would enhance and improve access to one of the few risk management tools that was specifically designed to support diversified and Organic operations. 

So far, the Senate version doesn’t include any visible aspect of improving the Whole Farm Revenue Protection Program, but we hope that will change soon. 

Last but not least, the Continuous Improvement and Accountability in Organic Standards Act would regulate and oversee the frequency with which the USDA reviews and enacts new Organic standards and rules. Our friends at the National Organic Program don’t necessarily love this piece of legislation, and admittedly, it isn’t perfect. But it would help prevent the backlog of rulemaking that has created a gap between consumer expectations and the reality of current Organic standards. 

But wait there’s more.

Here are three more bills we hope will make their way into the text of the Farm Bill:


MORE FARMER ADVOCACY EFFORTS

 To learn more about Georgia Organics, visit georgiaorganics.org or follow us on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube

Header Image: Farmer Julia Asherman of Rag & Frass Farm with Sen. Jon Ossoff’s Legislative Correspondent Caroline Li and Legistlative Director Anna Cullen, 2023.

Georgia Organics’ Farmer Advocacy News: Georgia Farmers Inform Our 2023 Farm Bill Priorities

By Michael Wall

Michael Wall is Georgia Organics’ Director of Advocacy and previous Director of Farmer Services. 

In 2021, the Georgia Organics board of directors passed a Strategic Plan that put the organization on a new path for advocacy, farm policy, and movement building. A new division of Georgia Organics, Farmer Advocacy, was launched in January 2022.  

To better understand the policy priorities of our farmers, Georgia Organics Farmer Advocacy, with input from Listen4Good and the Georgia Organics Advocacy and Programs Committee, launched a survey initiative. Over the spring and early summer of 2022, Georgia Organics distributed a survey to more than 1,000 farmers to determine their highest policy priorities. 

The results of that survey, featuring the input from 128 organic and sustainable farmers, are below. The survey data has also been published as a report (available here) that has been shared with dozens of advocacy partners and Congressional lawmakers. 

Demographic data on the farmers who filled out the survey is also provided at the conclusion of the survey’s results summary below.  

(Note: Funding to support the facilitation of this report was received from The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Georgia Organics’ Farmer Advocacy efforts have also received funding from Organic Valley and Farm Aid.) 

Rep. Austin Scott, vice chair of the U.S. House Committee on Agriculture, second from left, with farmer Russell Brydson of Narrow Way Farms, Director of Farmer Advocacy Michael Wall, and Legislative Director Zach Roberts. 

 

Survey Question: Which government functions are most important for your farm’s success? 

The majority of survey participants cited USDA programming on conservation as most important to their farm’s success.

The following statistics reflect the total survey participant responses, ranked by highest to lowest percentages:

  1. USDA Programming on conservation, such as the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS); 58.6%

  2. USDA Programming on crop insurance and access to capital, such as the Farm Service Agency (FSA); 40.23%

  3. Local zoning code and ordinances and code enforcement; 29.89%

  4. State regulations and enforcement; 21.84%

  5. State licensing; 18.39%

  6. National Organic Program (NOP) standards and enforcement; 12.64%

  7. Local licensing; 10.34%

  8. National Organic Program (NOP) organic transitioning support; 8.05%

 

Survey Question: Which institutions are most important for your farm’s success? Please select the two most important to your farm. 

The majority of survey participants cited USDA offices and Land Grant universities as the two institutions most important to their farm’s success.

The following statistics reflect the total survey participant responses, ranked by highest to lowest percentages:

  1. USDA offices, such as FSA, NRCS; 49.43% 

  2. Land Grant universities, because of their research, education, and extension offices; 44.83% 

  3. Other farmer services organizations, such as the Southeastern African-American Farmers Organic Network (SAAFON), Global Growers, Food Well Alliance, Southwest Georgia Project, etc.; 36.78% 

  4. Advocacy groups that address issues such as climate change, soil health, and racial equity; 35.63% 

  5. The Georgia Department of Agriculture (GDA); 33.33% 

 

Survey Question: Which of the following issues are most important for your farm’s success? 

The majority of survey participants cited healthy soil and access to capital and USDA programs as issues most important to their farm’s success, followed by a tie between conservation programs and land-ownership.

The following statistics reflect the total survey participant responses, ranked by highest to lowest percentages:

  1. Healthy soil; 52.87% 

  2. Accessing USDA programs; 42.53% 

  3. Access to capital; 32.18% 

  4. Climate change; 29.89% 

  5. (tie) Conservation programs: access and cost share amounts; 28.74% 

  6. (tie) Land-ownership; 28.74% 

  7. Health insurance costs and access; 25.29% 

  8. Racial equity; 18.39% 

  9. Building a statewide sustainable ag policy coalition; 13.79% 

  10. Succession planning; 8.05% 

  11. Access to land zoned for agriculture; 6.9% 

  12. Crop insurance and subsidies; 5.75% 

  13. Heirs property issues; 4.6% 


POLICY IMPLICATIONS: What We Gathered from Listening to Georgia Farmers

Based on the feedback provided by our farmers, Georgia Organics recommends the following policy shifts:


Demographics of Survey Participants

The following statistics reflect the total survey participant responses, ranked by highest to lowest percentages:

Relationship to Farming 

  • Farm owner
  • Farm Manager
  • Farm Worker
  • Community organizer
  • Other
  • Agricultural educator
  • Aspire to own farmland
  • Agricultural researcher
  • Don’t farm but aspire to (tie)
  • Farmer support service (tie)
  • Ag student
  • Farm owner
  • Farm Manager
  • Farm Worker
  • Community organizer
  • Other
  • Agricultural educator
  • Aspire to own farmland
  • Agricultural researcher
  • Don’t farm but aspire to (tie)
  • Farmer support service (tie)
  • Ag student
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants identified as farm owners. There was a small tie between those identifying as aspiring farmers and farmer support providers.

  1. Farm owner – 77.91%

  2. Farm Manager - 22.09% 

  3. Farm Worker – 17.44%

  4. Community organizer – 13.95%

  5. Other – 9.3%

  6. Agricultural educator – 6.98%

  7. Aspire to own farmland – 5.81%

  8. Agricultural researcher – 3.49%

  9. Don’t farm but aspire to (tie) – 2.33%

  10. Farmer support service (tie) – 2.33%

  11. Ag student – 1.16%

Farm and Production Type

  • Fruits
  • Eggs
  • Mushrooms
  • Goats or other small ruminants for meat
  • Beef cattle (tie)
  • Commodities (tie)
  • Chicken for meat
  • Hogs for meat
  • Grains (tie)
  • Goat milk (tie)
  • Row crops for livestock feed (tie)
  • Fruits
  • Eggs
  • Mushrooms
  • Goats or other small ruminants for meat
  • Beef cattle (tie)
  • Commodities (tie)
  • Chicken for meat
  • Hogs for meat
  • Grains (tie)
  • Goat milk (tie)
  • Row crops for livestock feed (tie)
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants claimed their main production to be diversified vegetable crops, along with fruits and eggs.

  1. Diversified veg - 78.67% 

  2. Fruits – 46.67% 

  3. Eggs – 34.67% 

  4. Mushrooms – 20% 

  5. Goats or other small ruminants for meat – 10.67% 

  6. Beef cattle (tie) – 8% 

  7. Commodities (tie) – 8% 

  8. Chicken for meat – 5.33% 

  9. Hogs for meat – 4% 

  10. Grains (tie) – 2.67% 

  11. Goat milk (tie) – 2.67% 

  12. Row crops for livestock feed (tie) – 2.67% 

Acreage 

  • less than 1 acre
  • 1 to 3
  • 4 to 10
  • 10 to 20
  • 30 to 50
  • 50 to 100
  • 100 to 300
  • 300 to 500
  • 500 to 1000
  • 1,000 to 2,000 acres
  • less than 1 acre
  • 1 to 3
  • 4 to 10
  • 10 to 20
  • 30 to 50
  • 50 to 100
  • 100 to 300
  • 300 to 500
  • 500 to 1000
  • 1,000 to 2,000 acres
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants claimed to farm on somewhere between less than an acre and 20 acres.

  1. <1 acre – 19.05% 

  2. 1 to 3 – 17.86% 

  3. 4 to 10 – 17.86% 

  4. 10 to 20 – 14.29% 

  5. 30 to 50 – 9.52% 

  6. 50 to 100 – 7.14% 

  7. 100 to 300 – 7.14% 

  8. 300 to 500 – 2.38% 

  9. 500 to 1,000 – 3.57% 

  10. 1,000 to 2,000 – 1.19% 

Age

  • 35 to 44 years
  • 45 to 54
  • 55 to 64
  • 65 to 74
  • 25 to 34
  • 17 or younger
  • 75 or older
  • 35 to 44 years
  • 45 to 54
  • 55 to 64
  • 65 to 74
  • 25 to 34
  • 17 or younger
  • 75 or older
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants identified as ages 35 to 64.

  1. 35-44 years – 38.55% 

  2. 45-54 – 20.48% 

  3. 55-64 – 15.66% 

  4. 65-74 – 14.46%% 

  5. 25-34 – 7.23% 

  6. 17 or younger – 2.41% 

  7. 75 or older – 1.20% 

  8. 18-24 – none 

Racial Identity

  • White
  • Black or African American
  • Asian or Asian American
  • Native American or Alaska native
  • Hispanic or Latino/a/x
  • Middle Eastern or North African
  • White
  • Black or African American
  • Asian or Asian American
  • Native American or Alaska native
  • Hispanic or Latino/a/x
  • Middle Eastern or North African
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants identified as white.

  1. White – 65.85%

  2. Black or African American – 25.61% * 

  3. Asian or Asian American – 6.10%

  4. Native American or Alaska Native – 6.10% 

  5. Hispanic or Latino/a/x – 4.88% 

  6. Middle Eastern or North African – 1.22% 

*In the U.S., Black farmers make up 1.4 percent of the farming community, and in Georgia, 4 percent, according to the USDA Census of Agriculture.  

Gender

  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-Binary
  • Man
  • Woman
  • Non-Binary
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants identified as men.

  1. Man – 57.5% 

  2. Woman – 41.25% 

  3. Non-Binary – 1.25% 

Future Farmer Engagement  

  • Number of Farmers
  • Number of Farmers
Hover your cursor over the chart for descriptors.

The majority of survey participants claimed they were in favor of supporting an advocacy committee and were willing to meet with Georgia-elected officials.

  1. Are willing to support an advocacy committee – 40 farmers 

  2. Are willing to meet with state-level elected officials – 38 farmers 

  3. Are willing to meet with USDA/GDA officials – 35 farmers 

  4. Are willing to meet with federal-level elected officials – 29 farmers 

  5. Not interested - 22 farmers 

To learn more about Georgia Organics, visit georgiaorganics.org and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn by searching the handle @GeorgiaOrganics or Georgia Organics. 

Farmer Advocacy at Georgia Organics: The Next Commissioner of Agriculture

For the first time in 12 years, Georgians will elect a new commissioner of agriculture this November, with three candidates vying for the position that oversees, regulates, or assists with dozens of crucial aspects of the food and farming system in Georgia. Agriculture is the state’s leading industry, generating $74 billion in economic activity each year.

Recognizing this historic moment, and the lack of attention this important race typically garners, Georgia Organics invited all three candidates to tour a certified organic farm, get to know the organization and the local and organic food movement, and speak with five certified organic farmers.

The Democratic and Republican candidates both accepted this invitation, and agreed to allow Georgia Organics to publish the answers to a series of questions so that our constituents could have a better understanding of their stances on issues important to our growers and members.

Democratic candidate Nakita Hemingway met with us on Oct. 3, 2022, and Republican candidate Tyler Harper met with us on Oct. 7, 2022. The Libertarian candidate David Raudabaugh was invited to answer the same questions on two occasions through a portal on his campaign’s website and has yet to reply. If he does, we will promote his answers as well.

To learn more about Georgia Organics’ Farmer Advocacy work, visit georgiaorganics.org/advocacy.

From left to right, Demetrius Milling, Russell Honderd, Joe Reynolds, Monica Ponce, Nakita Hemingway, and Daryll Bartolome.

From left to right, Russell Honderd, Joe Reynolds, Tyler Harper, Monica Ponce, Judith Winfrey, Georgia Organics President and CEO Alice Rolls, Matthew Agvent, and Demitrius Milling.

To learn more about our Farmer Advocacy work, visit georgiaorganics.org/advocacy and sign up for our email newsletter, The Dirt, for updates at bit.ly/thedirtsignup.

Advocacy Efforts Bring Top USDA Officials to Georgia

By Michael Wall

Certified organic farmers in Georgia have been hit with a perfect storm of challenges over the past few months that have made organic certification even harder to achieve and maintain than ever before.

Those challenges include major disruptions to the Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP) that now force farmers to apply for cost share support twice, through two separate application projects.

The process prior to 2020 reimbursed farmers for 75 percent of their certification costs, up to $750, with only one annual application. In a move that surprised and angered many agricultural leaders in Congress, not to mention farmers themselves the USDA Farm Service Agency reduced the reimbursements to $500 with no public input and little warning to growers.

The FSA change to organic cost share came in the first few months of the Corona-virus outbreak, which was also a time of great marketplace upheaval for restaurants and growers alike. And while this was going on, some certification agencies raised their prices so drastically that many long-time certified organic growers contemplated surrendering their organic certificates.

In February of 2022, Georgia Organics Farmer Advocate Michael Wall was able to share these challenges with USDA Undersecretary of Marketing and Regulatory Programs Jennifer Lester Moffitt in a virtual coffee chat, prompting Moffitt to travel to Crystal Organic Farm in Newborn, Georgia and hear from Georgia Organics farmers first hand.

On March 2, Moffitt visited with Georgia Organics and farmers Russell Brydson (Narrow Way Farm), Celia Barrs (Woodland Gardens), and Nicholas Donck (Crystal Organic Farm) to discuss rising certification costs and easing the barriers to achieving and maintaining organic certification.

During the meeting Moffitt outlined a new USDA initiative that would offer additional support for organic growers, and the conversation ranged from reimbursements and cost shares to certifier customer service, and the lack thereof. Moffitt was also extremely interested in learning more about Georgia Organics’ Accelerator program, 200 Organic Farms work, and the many obstacles organic farmers face in Georgia and the Southeast United States.

Moffitt, who began serving as the undersecretary on Aug. 11, 2021, grew up on and eventually ran a certified organic family walnut farm in California. Mofitt now oversees the division of the USDA that administers the National Organic Program, and many others, including domestic and international marketing of U.S. agricultural products, plant and animal health, genetically engineered organisms regulations, the Animal Welfare Act, and wildlife damage management.

The USDA recently released more details on the organic transitioning program Moffitt alluded to. While more details are needed, the new Organic Transition Initiative appears to be a much-needed commitment from the USDA to level the playing field for farmers seeking to achieve organic certification.

Lastly, the interaction with Moffitt and subsequent USDA actions to support organic agriculture confirm that advocacy efforts, as requested by Georgia Organics’ constituents, are an important part of the organization’s commitment to organic farmer prosperity.

The Organic Certification Cost Share Program will remain one of Georgia Organics’ top advocacy priorities as 2023 Farm Bill discussions heat up. Georgia Organics will continue to push for meaningful advances in the Farm Bill alongside its allies, especially the National Sustainable Coalition, which provided Georgia Organics with a grant to begin its farmer advocacy efforts, and the Organic Trade Association, upon whose Farmer Advisory Council, Climate Change Task Force, and Diversity Council Georgia Organics sits.

G.O. Goes to Washington to Support Organic Farmers

By Michael Wall

Michael Wall is Georgia Organics’ Director of Advocacy and previous Director of Farmer Services.

Georgia Organics Farmer Advocate Michael Wall and Albany organic farmer and Georgia Organics board member Sed Rowe asked federal lawmakers for more institutional support for organic growers on a March trip to Washington, D.C.

During the Organic Trade Association’s Organic Week and Advocacy Day, Rowe and Wall met with lawmakers or their staff from the offices of Rev. Sen. Raphael Warnock​, Rep. Nikema Williams​, Rep. Sanford Bishop​, and Sen. Mitch McConnel.

Farmer Sed Rowe and Farmer Advocate Michael Wall with staff members of Rep. Nikema Williams office on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.

The top priorities Rowe and Wall discussed with lawmakers included much-needed improvements to the Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP), which has been diminshed by recent changes enacted by the USDA Farm Service Agency. Also, they asked for the full amount of funding that has already been approved for the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE), program, the continuous improvement of the National Organic Program, continued funding for the OAO 2501 program and its support of BIPOC growers, and funding for organic research.

Farmer Advocate Michael Wall and National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Director Sarah Hackney, who has participated in and presented at numerous Georgia Organics Annual Conferences.

The meetings were either beginning or continuing important relationships that could benefit Georgia Organics’ farm members, especially during upcoming Farm Bill discussions, which have already kicked off with several U.S. House Agriculture Committee hearings.
In addition to the Capitol Hill visits, Rowe was also a panelist during a State Organic Network session and talked about his organic and hemp accomplishments achieved in partnership with Georgia Organics. And, Wall participated in several meetings as a member of OTA’s Farmers Advisory Council, Climate Change Task Force, and Diversity Committee. He also took the time in D.C. to meet with long-time partners at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC), which has worked hard for decades to forge the Farm Bill into legislation that puts organic farmers on equal footing with the rest of American agriculture.

To keep up with the Farm Bill and many other critical agriculture bills, sign up to receive NSAC’s weekly newsletters here, and learn more about the Farm Bill here.

Georgia Organics Launches Farmer Advocacy

By Michael Wall

Michael Wall is Georgia Organics’ Director of Advocacy and previous Director of Farmer Services.

As a non-profit, Georgia Organics updates its strategic plan every five years to ensure it remains on track with its mission, values, and farmer-focused programming.

Typically, the board of directors, key constituents, and important partners are interviewed to assess the changing landscape that Georgia Organics operates within, and the needs of the community that Georgia Organics attempts to serve.'

One of the surprising elements that emerged from these discussions in the most recent strategic plan was a strong direction for Georgia Organics to re-launch its advocacy efforts, this time with a singular focus on farmer prosperity.

To that end, and after months of conversations and planning within the Georgia Organics offices, Lauren Cox was promoted to Director of Farmer Services, and Michael Wall moved over to the new position of Director of Farmer Advocacy.
It must be noted that advocacy is not a brand-new effort for Georgia Organics.

Roughly 10 years ago, Georgia Organics had an Advocacy Director, Jennifer Owens, who addressed small-scale poultry processing, early Farm to School efforts, and many other important topics. Also, the Atlanta Local Food Initiative, another Georgia Organics initiative under the leadership of now Director of Programs Suzanne Girdner, also engaged in policy work that gave rise the City of Atlanta’s urban agriculture legislation and later the city’s first Urban Agriculture director position.

Wall and other members of the farmer services team, including Donn Cooper and Tenisio Seanima, and the board of directors, such as farmer Joe Reynolds of Love is Love Farm Collective, have worked on advocacy in the past, especially around the Farm Bill, SARE and NRCS funding, and the Organic Cost Share Reimbursement Program.

The strategic plan was approved by the Georgia Organics board of directors on Nov. 8, 2021, and includes several key themes that pertain to advocacy, partnerships, and movement building, especially around farmer prosperity, racial justice, and climate change.

For example, one of the plan’s goal states that Georgia Organics work would:
“Grow an influential network of advocates who champion organic and regenerative farmers.”

Other key themes from the Strategic Plan summary related to Farmer Advocacy work:

  • Move from program building to movement building. Step fully into our role as a convening and advocacy organization. 

  • Foster strong partnerships, and together pursue collective impact strategies.

  • Become an integral part of Georgia’s climate change solutions.

A summary of the strategic plan is below.

So far, Georgia Organics Farmer Advocacy work has been based on strong existing partnerships and previous advocacy experience, especially around the Farm Bill with partners such as the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and the Organic Trade Association. In March, Wall and organic farmer and board member Sed Rowe traveled to Washington, D.C., and met with federal lawmakers about the Farm Bill and the needs of Georgia’s organic farmers.

Georgia Organics and a handful of farmers also been hosted USDA Undersecretary Jennifer Lester Moffitt to discuss much-needed improvements to the Organic Cost Share Reimbursement Program, and the upcoming Organic Transitioning Initiative, which will have $300 million devoted to support farmers seeking organic certification.

Most importantly, Georgia Organics’ advocacy agenda will be set by its most important constituents: farmers. Over the Spring and early summer of 2022, Georgia Organics distributed a survey to more than 1,000 farmers to determine their highest policy priorities.

That survey will be finalized and analyzed over the coming weeks, and a report will be shared with Georgia Organics’ farmer members and partners.

2022-2026 STRATEGIC PLAN 

Key Themes and Shifts that Emerged from Internal and External Reviews:

  • Champion diversity, equity and inclusion internally and externally, working towards becoming an anti-racist organization  

  • Move from program building to movement building. Step fully into our role as a convening and advocacy organization.   

  • Invest in farmers, especially Black farmers, and local food communities.   

  • Refocus core programs by regionalizing/localizing work and centering on farmer prosperity.   

  • Foster strong partnerships, and together pursue collective impact strategies. 

  • Use the power of storytelling to recruit more advocates and members to the movement.  

  • Become an integral part of Georgia’s climate change solutions.   

  • Re-envision and reshape The Farmer Fund to increase impact.    

  • Expand and diversify revenue streams, including unrestricted revenue and fee-based services.  

  • Organize, invest in, and develop staff and board to ensure needed skills, aligning with the organization’s values and capacity to achieve goals.  

  • Consider these delivery mechanisms and ways to build the movement: direct services; partnerships; investment; convening and peer-to-peer services; advocacy. 

VISION

All Georgia farmers nurture and heal the land, people, and communities.   

MISSION 

Georgia Organics invests in organic farmers for the health of our communities and the land. 

VALUES



Farmer Prosperity  

We believe that thriving farmers are the catalyst for a transformed world playing the central role in the interdependency between restored soil, thriving people, stronger communities, and healthier environment.   

Soil Health and Environmental Stewardship 

We believe agriculture should use soil-building farming practices, and steward our air, land, and water resources.  

Anti-Racism  

We believe in working intentionally, consistently, and collaboratively to transform our food system, our farming system, and our own organization to one that is anti-racist, multi-cultural, diverse, and just.  

Community & Collective Impact 

We believe in the inherent talents, passions, and wisdom that exist in communities and our partners in the local food movement. We believe working collectively is essential to transforming our food system to be healthy, local and organic. 

Climate Action 

We believe organic farming is a critical solution to sequester carbon in our soil and mitigate the catastrophic impacts of climate change on people and ecosystems.    

Public Health 

We believe that public health begins in the soil where our food is grown and raised and organic farmers are stewards of our health and should be recognized and supported accordingly.